RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

ELECTRON IMPLICATIONS OF VALENT MOLECULAR ORBITALS IN THE POPULATION OF AnO (An = Th – Lr) RELATIONSHIPS

PII
S3034553725090094-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034553725090094
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 99 / Issue number 9
Pages
1360-1367
Abstract
Abstract. The dependence of contributions of electrons of valence molecular orbitals (MOs) of AnO (An = Th – Lr) to bond occupancies (according to Malliken) on the atomic number has been obtained by the relativistic method of discrete variation. It has been observed that electrons of external valence MOs (VVMOs) strengthen the bonding, while electrons of internal valence MOs (IVMOs) weaken such bonding on average by one-third. The efficiency (observed in the experiment) of VVMO formation characterizes the peculiarity of chemical bonding of actinide dioxides. With increasing , the influence of valence MO electrons on the covalent bond significantly decreases and it acquires a more ionic character. Significant effects of covalent bonding in AnO are observed due to the overlap of not only An 6- but also An 6- and An 5-atomic orbitals with ligand orbitals.
Keywords
диоксиды актиноидов внешние и внутренние валентные MO заселенность связей
Date of publication
13.03.2026
Year of publication
2026
Number of purchasers
0
Views
24

References

  1. 1. The chemistry of the actinide elements. V. 1&2. Edited by Katz J.J., Seaborg G.T., Morss L.R. London–New York: 1986 Chapman and Hall.
  2. 2. Rai B.K., Bretana A., Morrison G. et al. // Rep. Prog. Phys. 2024. V. 87. № 6. P. 066501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad38cb
  3. 3. Pereiro F.A., Galley S.S., Jackson J.A. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 63. P. 9687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03828
  4. 4. Legg F., Harding L.M., Lewis J.C. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 2024. V. 790. P. 140194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2023.140194
  5. 5. Thompson A., Limestall W., Nelson A. et al. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2024. A 42. 050802. https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0003534
  6. 6. Teterin Yu.A., Teterin A.Yu. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2004. V. 73. P. 541. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2004073n06ABEH000821
  7. 7. Teterin Yu.A., Ryzhkov M.V., Putkov A.E. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 6. P. 881. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622060274
  8. 8. Teterin Yu.A., Teterin A.Yu. // Nucl. Techn. Rad. Prot. 2004. V. 2. P. 3. https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP04020037
  9. 9. Gubanov V.A., Rosen A., Ellis D.E. // J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 1979. V. 40. P. 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697 (79)90090-8
  10. 10. Prodan I.D., Scuseria G.E., Martin R.L. // Phys. Rev. B. 2007. V. 76. P. 033101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.033101
  11. 11. Wen X.-D., Martin R.L., Henderson T.M., Scuseria G.E. // Chem. Rev. 2013. V. 113. P. 1063. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300374y
  12. 12. Teterin Yu.A., Gagarin S.G. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 1996. V. 65. P. 825. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC1996065n10ABEH000278
  13. 13. Kotani M., Ohno K., Kayama K. In: Handbush der Physik. V. 37/2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin ets. 1961. P. 173.
  14. 14. Берсукер И.Б. Электронное строение и свойства координационных соединений. Ленинград: Химия, 1976. 349 с.
  15. 15. Mulliken R.S. // Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1978. V. 29. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.29.100178.000245
  16. 16. Тетерин Ю.А., Путков А.Е., Тетерин А.Ю. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2024. № 7. С. 1.
  17. 17. Rosen A., Ellis D.E. // J. Chem. Phys. 1975. V. 62. P. 3039. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.430892
  18. 18. Adachi H. // Technol. Reports Osaka Univ. 1977. V. 1392. P. 569.
  19. 19. Gunnarsson O., Lundqvist B.I. // Phys. Rev. B. 1976. V. 13. P. 4274. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.4274
  20. 20. Pyykko P., Toivonen H. // Acta Acad. Aboensis, Ser. B. 1983. V. 43. P. 1.
  21. 21. Varshalovish D.A., Moskalev A.N., Khersonskii V.K. Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum. World Scientific, Singapore. 1988. 439 p.
  22. 22. Teterin Yu.A., Maslakov K.I., Teterin A. Yu. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2013. V. 87. P. 245108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245108
  23. 23. Teterin Yu.A., Teterin A. Yu., Ivanov K.E. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2014. V. 89. P. 035102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.035102
  24. 24. Gelius U., Allan C.J., Johansson G. et al. // C. Physica Scripta. 1971. V. 3. P. 237. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/3/5/008
  25. 25. Yarzhemsky V.G., Nefedov V.I., Amusya M. Ya. u dp. // J. Electr. Spectr. Relat. Phenom. 1981. V. 23. № 2. P. 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0368-2048 (81)80033-3
  26. 26. Yarzhemsky V.G., Teterin A.Yu., Teterin Yu.A., Trzhaskovskaya M.B. // Nucl. Techn. Rad. Prot. 2012. V. 27. P. 103. https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP12021037
  27. 27. Teterin Y.A., Putkov A.E., Ryzhkov M.V. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2023. V. 33. № 5. P. 605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2023.09.004
  28. 28. Teterin Y.A., Ryzhkov M.V., Putkov A.E. et al. // J. Struct. Chem. 2023. V. 64. № 9. P. 1644. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476623090081
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library