RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

Acid-base properties of the surface of silicon oxycarbon composites based on activated carbon and silica gel and their effect on dye adsorption

PII
S3034553725110057-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034553725110057
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 99 / Issue number 11
Pages
1641-1647
Abstract
A mechanochemical synthesis of silicon-oxygen-carbon composites was carried out using mixtures of activated carbon and silica gel in various mass ratios. The resulting materials were found to possess a uniform amorphous structure and well-developed porosity. It was shown that the acid-base surface properties are governed by phenolic, carboxyl, and silanol groups of different configurations, with the dominant contribution coming from groups with pK values of 8.5- 12. An increase in the concentration of these groups accompanied by a decrease in the concentration of groups with pK 0-5 leads to a higher pH at the point of zero charge. It was revealed that, due to electrostatic interactions, the synthesized composites adsorb methyl orange more effectively than methylene blue. The highest adsorption capacity toward methyl orange (286.2 mg/g) was observed for the sample obtained from the mixture with an activated carbon-to-silica gel mass ratio of 1:2.
Keywords
кремнийоксиуглеродный композит функциональные группы кислотно-основные свойства адсорбция метиловый оранжевый метиленовый голубой
Date of publication
20.05.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
30

References

  1. 1. Stabler C., Ionescu E., Graczyk-Zajac M., et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018. V. 101. P. 4817. DOI: 10.1111/jace.15932.
  2. 2. Widgeon S.J., Sen S., Mera G., et al. // Chem. Mat. 2010. V. 22. P. 6221. DOI: 10.1021/cm1021432.
  3. 3. Marchewka J., Jelen P., Rutkowska I., et al. // Materials. 2021. V. 14. P. 1340. DOI: 10.3390/ma14061340.
  4. 4. Mera G., Gallei M., Bernard S., et al. // Nanomater. 2015. V. 5. P. 468. DOI: 10.3390/nano5020468.
  5. 5. Lu K. // Mater. Sci. Eng.: R: Rep. 2015. V. 97. P. 23. DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2015.09.001.
  6. 6. Adam M., Vakifahmetoglu C., Colombo P., et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013. V. 97. № 3. P. 959. DOI: 10.1111/jace.12708.
  7. 7. Tamayo A., Mazo M.A., Ruiz-Caro R., et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2015. V. 280. P. 165—174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.111.
  8. 8. Liao N., Zheng B., Zhang M., Xue W. // Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2019. Vol. 44. № 48. P. 26679. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.098.
  9. 9. Graczyk-Zajac M., Vrankovic D., Waleska P., et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018. V. 6. P. 93. DOI: doi.org/10.1039/C7TA09236A.
  10. 10. Pan J., Shen W., Zhao Y., et al. // Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019. V. 584. P. 124041. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124041.
  11. 11. Pan J., Ren J., Xie Y., et al. // Res. Chem. Intermed. 2017. V. 43. P. 3813. DOI: 10.1007/s11164-016-2850-y.
  12. 12. Bruzzoniti M.C., Appendini M., Onida B., et al. // Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018. V. 25. N. 11. P. 10619. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1367-x.
  13. 13. Yu Z., Feng Y., Li S., Pei Y. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016. V. 36. N. 15. P. 3627. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeucercamsc.2016.02.003.
  14. 14. Meng L., Zhang X., Tang Y., et al. // Sci Rep. 2015. V. 5. P. 7910. DOI: 10.1038/srep07910.
  15. 15. Simões dos Reis G., Sampaio C.H., Lima E.C., Wilhelm M. // Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016. V. 497. P. 304. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.021.
  16. 16. Wasan Awin E., Lale A., Kumar K., et al. // Materials. 2018. V. 11. N. 3. P. 362. DOI: 10.3390/ma11030362.
  17. 17. Hojamberdiev M., Prasad R.M., Morita K., et al. // Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2012. V. 151. P. 330-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.10.015.
  18. 18. Wen Q., Yu Z., Riedel R. // Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020. V. 109. P. 100623. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100623.
  19. 19. Yu S., Tu R., Goto T. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016. V. 36. P. 403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeucercamsc.2015.10.029.
  20. 20. Zare A., Su Q., Gigax J., et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2019. V. 446. P. 10. DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2019.03.009.
  21. 21. Grishin I.S., Smirnov N.N., Smirnova D.N. // Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2023. V. 14. P. 800. DOI: 10.1134/S2075113323030152.
  22. 22. Gorgulho H.F., Mesquita J.P., Gonçalves F., et al. // Carbon. 2008. V. 46. No. 12. P. 1544. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.06.045.
  23. 23. Feng J., Xiao Y., Jiang Y., Feng J. // Ceram. Int. 2015. V. 41. P. 5281. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.111.
  24. 24. Mazo M.A., Tamayo A., Rubio J. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016. V. 36. N. 10. P. 2443. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeucercamsc.2016.03.012.
  25. 25. Guo S., Zou Z., Chen Y., et al. // Environ. Pollut. 2023. V. 320. P. 121060. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121060.
  26. 26. Liu X., Cheng J., Lu X., Wang R. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 16. P. 26909. DOI: 10.1039/c4cp02955k.
  27. 27. Rimola A., Costa D., Sodupe M., et al. // Chem. Rev. 2013. V. 113. N. 6. P. 4216. DOI: 10.1021/cr3003054.
  28. 28. Lee H., Fiore S., Berruti F. // Biomass and Bioenergy. 2024. V. 191. P. 107446. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107446.
  29. 29. Eleryan A.A., Hassaan M., Altaf N.M., et al. // Sci. Rep. 2024. V. 14. N. 1. P. 13585. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63510-0.
  30. 30. Ouedrhiri A., Lghazi Y., Bahar J., et al. // Phys. Chem. Res. 2022. V. 10. N. 3. P. 301. DOI: 10.22036/PCR.2021.303554.1968.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library