Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

Alkaline Carbonization of Polyacrylonitrile for the Preparation of Microporous Carbon Materials

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044453723010077-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044453723010077
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
M. N. Efimov
  • Affiliation: Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 97 / Issue number 1
Pages
112-120
Abstract
A method has been proposed for the synthesis of activated carbon materials (ACMs) based on polyacrylonitrile (PAN) by activation with potassium hydroxide under the action of IR heating. Two approaches to the chemical activation of the polymer precursor were presented: formation of ACM based on PAN preliminarily heat-treated at 200°C and based on PAN carbonized at 700°C by impregnation with an aqueous alkali solution followed by heating to 800°C. Due to the use of IR radiation, the heating can be performed at a rate of 50 K/min, and the exposure time at a given temperature can be reduced to 2 min. The dependence of the specific surface area and porosity of ACM according to BET on the synthesis conditions was studied. The proposed approaches lead to the formation of ACMs with specific surface areas of 1091 and 2121 m2/g, respectively.
Keywords
активированный углерод полиакрилонитрил ИК-нагрев микропористый материал химическая активация
Date of publication
12.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Mochalin V.N., Shenderova O., Ho D., Gogotsi Y. // Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012. V. 7. P. 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.209
  2. 2. Wang J., Kaskel S. // J. Mater. Chem. 2012. V. 22. P. 23710. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM34066F
  3. 3. Speranza G. // Nanomater. 2021. V. 11. P. 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11040967
  4. 4. Lazarotto J.S., da Boit Martinello K., Georgin J. et al. // Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022. V. 180. P. 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.01.044
  5. 5. Pui W.K., Yusoff R., Aroua M.K. // Rev. Chem. Eng. 2019. V. 35. P. 649. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0057
  6. 6. Abalyaeva V.V., Efimov M.N., Efimov O.N. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2020. V. 354. P. 136671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136671
  7. 7. Zheng L., Li W.B., Chen J.L. // RSC Adv. 2018. V. 8. P. 29767. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA04367A
  8. 8. Efimov M.N., Mironova E.Y., Vasilev A.A. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021. V. 9. P. 106429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106429
  9. 9. Iwanow M., Gärtner T., Sieber V., König B. // Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020. V. 16. P. 1188. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.104
  10. 10. Mopoung S., Dejang N. // Sci. Rep. 2021. V. 11. P. 13948. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93249-x
  11. 11. Januszewicz K., Kazimierski P., Klein M. et al. // Mater. 2020. V. 13. P. 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092047
  12. 12. Franco D.S.P., Georgin J., Netto M.S. et al. // Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022. V. 29. P. 31085.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17846-z
  13. 13. Cao Y., Wang K., Wang X. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2016. V. 212. P. 839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.069
  14. 14. Suhas Gupta V.K., Carrott P.J.M. et al. // Bioresour. Technol. 216 (2016) 1066–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.106
  15. 15. Wu Q., Liang D., Ma X. et al. // RSC Adv. 2019. V. 9. P. 26676. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA04959B
  16. 16. Munoz M., Kolb V., Lamolda A. et al. // Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017. V. 218. P. 498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.001
  17. 17. Ma J., Liu J., Song J., Tang T. // RSC Adv. 2018. V. 8. P. 2469. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA12733B
  18. 18. Sevilla M., Valle-Vigón P., Fuertes A.B. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011. V. 21. P. 2781. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201100291
  19. 19. Díez N., Sevilla M., Fombona-Pascual A., Fuertes A.B. // Batter. Supercaps. 2022. V. 5. P. e202100169. https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202100169
  20. 20. Li K., Wang C. et al. // Res. Chem. Intermed. 2020. V. 46. P. 3459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-020-04156-1
  21. 21. de Paula F.G.F., de Castro M.C.M., Ortega P.F.R. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018. V. 267. P. 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROMESO.2018.03.027
  22. 22. Shen W., Zhang S., He Y. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2011. V. 21. P. 14036. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM12585K
  23. 23. Ma C., Bai J., Hu X. et al. // J. Environ. Sci. 2023. V. 125. P. 533. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JES.2022.03.016
  24. 24. Podyacheva O.Y., Cherepanova S.V., Romanenko A.I. et al. // Carbon N. Y. 2017. V. 122. P. 475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.094
  25. 25. Podyacheva O.Y., Ismagilov Z.R. // Catal. Today. 2015. V. 249. P. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.10.033
  26. 26. Zhao L., Wang Y., Li W. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. P. 90076. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA17049H
  27. 27. Wang Y., Fugetsu B., Wang Z. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2017. V. 7. P. 40259. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40259
  28. 28. Gao L., Lu H., Lin H. et al. // Chem. Res. Chinese Univ. 2014. V. 30. P. 441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242-014-4059-1
  29. 29. Hsiao H.Y., Huang C.M., Hsu M.Y., Chen H. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011. V. 82. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.08.006
  30. 30. Marrakchi F., Ahmed M.J., Khanday W.A. et al. // Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017. V. 98. P. 233. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2017.01.119
  31. 31. Novais R.M., Caetano A.P.F., Seabra M.P. et al. // J. Clean. Prod. 2018. V. 197. P. 1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.06.278
  32. 32. Efimov M.N., Vasilev A.A., Muratov D.G. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019. V. 7. P. 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2019.103514
  33. 33. Yushkin A.A., Efimov M.N., Malakhov A.O. et al. // React. Funct. Polym. 2021. V. 158. P. 104793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104793
  34. 34. Юшкин А.А., Ефимов М.Н., Васильев А.А. и др. // Мембраны и мембранные технологии. 2017. Т. 7. С. 125. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2218117217020080
  35. 35. Lee W.H., Bae J.Y., Yushkin A. et al. // J. Memb. Sci. 2020. V. 613. P. 118477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118477
  36. 36. Sakamoto T., Amano Y., Machida M. // SN Appl. Sci. 2020. V. 2. No 4. P. 702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2465-1
  37. 37. Ruhland K., Frenzel R., Horny R. et al. // Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017. V. 146. P. 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.10.018
  38. 38. Rahaman M.S.A., Ismail A.F., Mustafa A. // Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2007. V. 92. P. 1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.023
  39. 39. Ferrari A.C., Robertson J. // Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2004. V. 362. P. 2477. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2004.1452
  40. 40. Vasiliev V.P., Manzhos R.A., Kochergin V.K. et al. // Mater. 2022. V. 15. P. 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030821
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library