- PII
- 10.31857/S0044453723010260-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044453723010260
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 97 / Issue number 1
- Pages
- 121-127
- Abstract
- A study is performed of the effect TiO2 nanoparticles have on the temperature dependence of the direct current conductivity of epoxy polymers. The value of direct current conductivity is determined by analyzing the frequency dependence of the complex permittivity in the 102–105 Hz range of frequencies. Two characteristic regions are found on the temperature dependence of direct current conductivity: the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann dependence above the glass transition temperature (Tg), and the Arrhenius dependence below Tg, due apparently to a change in the mechanism of conduction after the freezing of ionic mobility at temperatures
- Keywords
- эпоксидный нанокомпозит наночастицы TiO<sub>2</sub> сквозная проводимость широкополосная диэлектрическая спектроскопия
- Date of publication
- 12.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 12
References
- 1. Chu B., Zhou X., Ren K. et al. // Sci. 2006. V. 313. P. 334. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127798
- 2. Prateek, Thakur V.K., Gupta R.K. // Chem. Rev. 2016. V. 116. P. 4260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00495
- 3. Huang X., Jiang P., Xie L. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009. V. 95. P. 242901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3273368
- 4. Xie L.Y., Huang X.Y., Wu C. et al. // Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011. V. 21. № 16. P. 5897. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm04574h
- 5. Luo H., Chen C., Zhou K. et al. // RSC Advances. 2015. V. 5. № 84. P. 68515. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra11753d
- 6. ahimabady M., Mirshekarloo M.S., Yao K. et al. // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2013. V. 15. № 38. P. 16242. 10.1039/c3cp52267
- 7. Ioannou G., Patsidis A., Psarras G.C. // Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2011. V. 42. № 1. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.010
- 8. Patsidis A., Psarras G.C. // ExP. Polym. Lett. 2008. V. 2. № 10. P. 718. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.85
- 9. Wang J., Liu S., Wang J. et al. // Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2017. V. 726. P. 587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.341
- 10. Hu P., Wang J., Shen Y. et al. // Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013. V. 1. № 39. P. 12321. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta11886j
- 11. Kim J.Y., Jung H.S., No J.H. et al. // Journal of Electroceramics. 2006. V. 16. № 4. P. 447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-006-9895-z
- 12. Homes C.C., Vogt T. // Nature Materials. 2013. V. 12. № 9. P. 782. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3744
- 13. Noman M.T., Ashraf M.A., Ali A. // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019. V. 26. P. 3262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3884-z
- 14. Kontos G.A., Soulintzis A.L., Karahaliou P.K. et al. // ExP.Polym. Lett. 2007. V. 1. № 12. P. 781. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.108
- 15. Tomara G.N., Kerasidou A.P., Patsidis A.C. et al. // Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2015. V. 71. P. 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.017
- 16. Parker R.A. // Phys. Rev. 1961. V. 124. № 6. P. 1719. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.124.1719
- 17. Yu E., Zhang Q., Xu N. et al. // RSC Advances. 2017. V. 7. № 7. P. 3949. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra26772f
- 18. Guo R., Luo H., Liu W. et al. // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2018. V. 20. № 26. P. 18031. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp02958j
- 19. Basu R., Iannacchione G.S. // Journal of Applied Physics. 2008. V. 104. № 11. P. 114107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3035963
- 20. Dang Z., Shen Y., Fan L. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2003. V. 93. № 9. P. 5543. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1562740
- 21. Su R., Luo Z., Zhang D. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016. V. 120. № 22. P. 11769. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01853
- 22. Dang Z.M., Yuan J.K., Zha J.W. et al. // Progress in Materials Science. 2013. V. 57. № 4. P. 660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.08.001
- 23. Xu N., Hu L., Zhang Q. et al. // ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015. V. 7. № 49. P. 27373. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08987
- 24. Guo N., DiBenedetto S.A., Tewari P. et al. // Chemistry of Materials. 2010. V. 22. № 4. P. 1567. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm902852h
- 25. Khan M., Khurram A.A., Li T. et al. // Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2018. V. 34. № 12. P. 2424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.06.014
- 26. Zha J.W., Song H.T., Dang Z.M. et al. // Applied Physics Letters. 2008. V. 93. № 19. P. 192911. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3025408
- 27. Zhang Y.H., Dang Z.M., Xin J.H. et al. // Macromolecular Rapid Comm. 2005. V. 26. № 18. P. 1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200500310
- 28. Zha J.W., Dang Z.M., Zhou T. et al. // Synthetic Metals. 2010. V. 160. № 23. P. 2670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.10.024
- 29. Берестенко В.И., Торбов В.И., Чукалин В.И. и др. // Химия высоких энергий. 2011. Т. 45. № 5. С. 468. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16766121
- 30. Букичев Ю.С., Богданова Л.М., Спирин М.Г. и др. // Вестн. Московского авиационного института. 2021. Т. 28. № 2. С. 224. https://doi.org/10.34759/vst-2021-2-224-237
- 31. Новиков Г.Ф., Рабенок Е.В., Эстрин Я.И. и др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2014. Т. 88. № 10. С. 1605. https://doi.org/10.7868/S004445371410029X
- 32. Novocontrol GmbH // WinFit 2.9 Owner’s Manual. 2000. № 12. P. 137.
- 33. Monai M., Montini T., Fornasiero P. // Catalysts. 2017. V. 7. № 10. P. 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7100304
- 34. Nikonorova N.A., Barmatov E.B., Pebalk D.A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007. V. 111. № 24. P. 8451. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp068688a
- 35. Новиков Г.Ф., Рабенок Е.В., Богданова Л.М., Иржак В.И. // Журн. физ. химии. 2017. Т. 91. № 10. С. 1760. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044453717100302
- 36. Новиков Г.Ф., Рабенок Е.В., Богданова Л.М. // Сборник трудов XVIII Международной конференции по химии и физикохимии олигомеров. Нижний Новгород, 2019. Т. 2. С. 74.
