- PII
- 10.31857/S0044453723020206-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044453723020206
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 97 / Issue number 2
- Pages
- 279-284
- Abstract
- the properties of nanosized sorbents prepared by high-energy milling from microcrystalline powder of titanium dioxide of rutile modification have been studied. It was established that milling to an average crystallite size of ~30 nm and ultraviolet illumination significantly improved the sorption properties of rutile with respect to chromium compared with those of the starting material and the ability of Cr(VI) to be reduced to Cr(III) in its presence. The maximum removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions with a concentration of 50 mg/L was achieved under UV illumination in an acetate buffer medium at pH 4–5 and a content of ground rutile of 16.7 g/L. A mechanism of adsorption was proposed.
- Keywords
- : рутил хром(VI) ультрафиолет адсорбция
- Date of publication
- 12.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 13
References
- 1. Jegadeesan G., Al-Abed S.R., Sundaram V. et al. // Water Res. 2010. V. 44. P. 965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.047
- 2. Kuz'micheva G.M., Savinkina E.V., Obolenskaya L.N. et al. // Crystallogr. Rep. 2010. V. 55. P. 866. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774510050287
- 3. Vidhya B., Ford A. // Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2013. V. 5. P. 980. https://doi.org/10.1166/nnl.2013.1663
- 4. Uzunova-Bujnova M., Dimitrov D., Radev D. et al. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008. V. 110. P. 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.02.005
- 5. Мельчакова О.В., Печищева Н.В., Коробицына А.Д. // Цветные металлы. 2019. № 1. С. 32. https://doi.org/10.17580/tsm.2019.01.05
- 6. Ординарцев Д.П., Печищева Н.В., Валеева А.А. и др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2022. Т. 96. № 11 – в печати.
- 7. Cheng Q., Wang C., Doudrick K. et al. // Appl. Catal. B. 2015. V. 176. P. 740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.047
- 8. Ma C.M., Shen Y.S., Lin P.H. // Int. J. Photoenergy. 2012. 381971. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/381971
- 9. Ku Y., Jung I.-L. // Wat. Res. 2001. V. 35. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354 (00)00098-1
- 10. Zhang H., Bartlett R.J. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999. V. 33. P. 588. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980608w
- 11. Fendorf S.E. // Geoderma. 1995. V. 67. P. 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061 (94)00062-f
- 12. Wang Y., Peng C., Padilla-Ortega E. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020. 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104031
- 13. Zurek J.M., Paterson M.J. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2012. V. 116. P. 5375. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp302300q
- 14. Kirk A.D. // Comments Inorg. Chem. 1993. V. 14. P. 89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02603599308048658
- 15. Morales-Pérez A.-A., García-Pérez R., Tabla-Vázquez C.-G. et al. // Topics in Catalysis. 2020. V. 64. P. 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-020-01346-4
- 16. Tan Y., Lim Y.B., Altieri K.E. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012. V. 12. P. 801. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-801-2012
- 17. Moffat T.P., Latanision R.M., Ruf R.R. // Electrochim. Acta. 1995. V. 40. P. 1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686 (95)00015-7
