Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Inclusion Complexes of β-Cyclodextrin with Fingolimod

You can
PII
10.31857/S0044453723030135-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044453723030135
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
I. V Terekhova
  • Affiliation: G.A. Krestov Institute of Chemistry of Solutions, Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume 97 / Issue number 3
Pages
378-385
Abstract
The solubilizing effect of β-cyclodextrin on fingolimod, a new generation immunosuppressant, is studied for the first time. A possible 20× increase in the solubility of fingolimod due to the penetration of the hydrophobic fragment of the drug molecule into the macrocyclic cavity of the cyclodextrin is shown. Data driven 1H NMR spectroscopy and computer modeling suggest the configuration of the resulting inclusion complexes. The constant of the complex’s stability and its energy of complexation are calculated, and the formation of hydrogen bonds between fingolimod and β-cyclodextrin is considered.
Keywords
циклодекстрин финголимод комплексообразование солюбилизация
Date of publication
12.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Salem H., Abo Elsoud F.A., Heshmat D. // Spectrochim. Acta. A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021. V. 250. P. 119331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.119331
  2. 2. Jaafar N., Zeineddine M., Massouh J. et al. // Mult. Scler. Relat. 2019. V. 36. P. 101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.101437
  3. 3. Strader C.R., Pearce C.J., Orberlies N.H. // J. Nat. Prod. 2011. V. 74. № 4. P. 900. https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/np2000528
  4. 4. Al-Izki S., Pryce G., Jackson S.J. et al. // Mult. Scler. J. 2011. V. 17. № 8. P. 939. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511400476
  5. 5. Pelletier D., Hafler M.D., Hafler D.A. // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. V. 366. P. 339. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMct1101691
  6. 6. Aytan N., Choi J.-K., Carreras I. // Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 6. № 1. P. 24939. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24939
  7. 7. Nasser A. // J. Basic. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2019. V. 30. № 5. P. 31469655. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0063
  8. 8. Medeiros da Silva M., Odebrecht de Souza R., Gonçalves M.V.M. // J. Neuroimmunol. 2022. V. 2. P. 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nerep.2022.100071
  9. 9. Gomez-Mayordomo V., Montero-Escribano P., Matías-Guiu J.A. et al. // J. Med. Virol. 2020. V. 93. № 1. P. 546. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26279
  10. 10. Mona J., Kuo C.-J., Perevedentseva E. et al. // Diam. Relat. Mater. 2013. V. 39. P. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2013.08.001
  11. 11. Center for drug Evaluation and Research. 2010. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/ 2010/022527orig1s000clinpharmr.pdf
  12. 12. Tamakuwala M., Stagni G. // AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2016. V. 17. P. 907. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-015-0415-9
  13. 13. Ward M.D., Jones D.E., Goldman M.D. // Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2014. V. 13. P. 989. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2014.920820
  14. 14. Miranda R.R., Ferreira N.N., de Souza E.E. et al. // ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022. V. 5. P. 3371. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c00349
  15. 15. Zeraatpisheh Z., Mirzaei E., Nami M. et al. // Eur. J. Neurosci. 2021. V. 54. № 4. P. 5620. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15391
  16. 16. Shirmard L.R., Ghofrani M., Javan N.B. et al. // Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2020. V. 46. № 2. P. 318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2020.1721524
  17. 17. Shahsavari S., Shirmard L.R., Amini M. et al. // J. Pharm. Sci. 2016. V. 106. P. 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.07.026
  18. 18. Javan N.B., Shirmard L.R., Omid N.J. et al. // J. Microencapsul. 2016. V. 33. № 5. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3109/10837450.2015.1108982
  19. 19. Zou X., Jiang Z., Li L. et al. // Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2021. V. 49. № 1. P. 83. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2021.1871620
  20. 20. Jacob S., Nair A.B. // Drug Dev. Res. 2018. V. 79. № 5. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21452
  21. 21. Terekhova I., Kritskiy I., Agafonov M. et al. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020. V. 21. № 23. P. 9102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239102
  22. 22. Garibyan A., Delyagina E., Agafonov M. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2022. V. 360 P. 119548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119548
  23. 23. Saokham P., Muankaew C., Jansook P. et al. // Molecules. 2018. V. 23. № 5. P. 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051161
  24. 24. dos Passos Menezes P., de Araújo Andrade T., Frank L.A. et al. // Int. J. Pharm. 2019. V. 559. P. 312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.01.041
  25. 25. Job P. // Annual Chemistry. 1928. V. 9. P. 113.
  26. 26. Becke A.D. // Phys. Rev. A. 1988. V. 38. P. 3098. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098
  27. 27. Lee C., Yang W., Parr R.G. // Phys. Rev. B. 1988. V. 37. P. 785. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
  28. 28. Frisch M.J., Trucks G.W., Schlegel H.B. et al.// Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016
  29. 29. Morris G.M., Huey R., Lindstrom W. et al. // J. Comp. Chem. 2009. V. 16. P. 2785. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256
  30. 30. GROMACS 2019.6. https://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2019.6.
  31. 31. Nose S. // Mol. Phys. 1984. V. 52. P. 255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978400101201
  32. 32. Hoover W.G. // Phys. Rev. A. 1985. V. 31. P. 1695. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
  33. 33. Allen M.P., Tildesley D.J. // Computer Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon Press, London, 1987.
  34. 34. Darden T., York D., Pedersen L. // J. Chem. Phys. 1993. V. 98. P. 10089.
  35. 35. Essmann M.U., Perera L., Berkowitz M.L. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1995. V. 103. P. 8577. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470117
  36. 36. Hess M.B., Bekker H., Berendsen H.J.C. et al. // J. Comput. 1997. V. 18. № 12. P. 1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12%3C1463::AID-JCC4%3E3.0.CO;2-H
  37. 37. Jorgensen W.L., Tirado-Rives J. // PNAS. 2005. V. 102. P. 6665. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408037102
  38. 38. Dodda L.S., Vilseck J.Z., Tirado-Rives J. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2017. V. 121. P. 3864. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b00272
  39. 39. Dodda L.S., de Vaca I.C., Tirado-Rives J. et al. // Nucleic Acids Res. 2017. V. 45. Web Server issue W331. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx312
  40. 40. Jorgensen W.L., Maxwell D.S., Tirado-Rives J. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996. V. 118. P. 11225. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9621760
  41. 41. Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K. // J. Mol. Graph. 1996. V. 14. P. 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855 (96)00018-5
  42. 42. Higuchi T., Connors K. // Adv. Anal. Chem. Instrum. 1964. V. 4. P. 117.
  43. 43. Saokham P., Muankaew C., Jansook P. et al. // Molecules. 2018. V. 23. № 5. P. 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051161
  44. 44. Prajapati M., Loftsson T. // J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022. V. 69. P. 103106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103106
  45. 45. Szejtli J. // Chem. Rev. 1998. V. 98. P. 1743. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr970022c
  46. 46. Jacob S., Nair A.B. // Drug Dev. Res. 2018. V. 79. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21452
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library