- PII
- 10.31857/S0044453723050138-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044453723050138
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 97 / Issue number 5
- Pages
- 602-606
- Abstract
- The photophysical properties of an original covalently-bonded dyad based on a perylene derivative and IR-780 cyanine dye were studied. The dyad has pronounced absorption in the NIR region of the spectrum and a strong fluorescence signal, which is weakly quenched by the influence of the perylene derivative. Upon excitation of the dyad in the absorption region of perylene, a fluorescence signal from IR-780 is detected due to the Förster energy transfer mechanism. It is shown that the dyad does not generate singlet oxygen upon photoexcitation in the NIR region of the spectrum. However, it can generate superoxide anion radicals, indicating the presence of the photoinduced electrons transfer from the dye to the perylene.
- Keywords
- перилен цианиновый краситель диада флуоресценция ближний ИК-диапазон перенос электрона
- Date of publication
- 12.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 9
References
- 1. Chen H., Zhang W., Zhu G. et al. // Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017. V. 2. № 7. P. 17024. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.24
- 2. Yang Z., Tian R., Wu J. et al. // ACS Nano 2017. V. 11. № 4. P. 4247. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b01261
- 3. Li J., Pu K. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019. V. 48. № 1. P. 38. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00001H
- 4. Wang Y.-Y.Y., Liu Y.-C.C., Sun H. et al. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019. V. 395. P. 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.05.016
- 5. Meredith P., Li W., Armin A. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2020. V. 10. № 33. P. 2001788. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202001788
- 6. Praikaew P., Maniam S., Charoenpanich A. et al. // J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019. V. 382. P. 111852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.05
- 7. Fan Q., Cheng K., Yang Z. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2015. V. 27. № 5. P. 843. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201402972
- 8. Yang Z., Dai Y., Shan L. et al. // Nanoscale Horizons 2019. V. 4. № 2. P. 426. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NH00307F
- 9. Li Q., Huang C., Liu L. et al. // Cytom. Part A 2018. № 93. P. 997. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23596
- 10. Rybkin A.Y., Belik A.Y., Goryachev N.S. et al. // Dye. Pigment. 2020. V. 180. P. 108411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108411
- 11. Rybkin A.Y., Belik A.Y., Kraevaya O.A. et al. // Dye. Pigment. 2019. V. 160. P. 457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.06.041
- 12. Spiller W., Kliesch H., Wöhrle D. et al. // J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 1998. V. 02. № 02. P. 145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1099-1409(199803/04)2:23
- 13. Kuznetsova N.A., Gretsova N.S., Derkacheva V.M. et al. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2002. V. 72. № 2. P. 300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015402524813
- 14. Yamakoshi Y., Umezawa N., Ryu A. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003. V. 125. № 42. P. 12803. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0355574
- 15. Ford W.E., Kamat P. V. // J. Phys. Chem. 1987. V. 91. № 25. P. 6373. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100309a012
- 16. Levitz A., Marmarchi F., Henary M. // Molecules. 2018. V. 23. № 2. P. 1. 10.3390/molecules23020226
- 17. Rurack K. // Stand. Qual. Assur. Fluoresc. Meas. I Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008 P. 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/4243_2008_019
- 18. Seybold P.G., Gouterman M., Callis J. // Photochem. Photobiol. 1969. V. 9. № 3. P. 229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1969.tb07287.x
- 19. Müller S., Mantareva V., Stoichkova N. et al. // J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1996. V. 35. № 3. P. 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344 (96)07294-6
- 20. Rybkin A.Y., Belik A.Y., Tarakanov P.A. et al. // Macroheterocycles. 2019. V. 12. № 2. P. 181. https://doi.org/10.6060/mhc190446r
