- PII
- 10.31857/S0044453723070191-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044453723070191
- Publication type
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 97 / Issue number 7
- Pages
- 1050-1055
- Abstract
- Iron oxide nanopowders are synthesized via chemical precipitation. It is shown that synthesis produces an iron oxide phase with a magnetite structure (either a magnetite–maghemite solid solution or a mixture of this solid solution and goethite). The sizes of the CSR and particles for the main phase are ~10–20 nm. The synthesized iron oxide powders have developed surfaces, specific surface area SBET ≈ 92 and 117 m2/g, and identical fairly large specific pore volumes (VP/P0→0.99/0→0.99 = 0.35 cm3/g). It is shown that additional in situ ultrasonic treatment of the magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in the mother liquor results in abrupt oxidation of iron(II) ions and creates a nonmagnetic impurity phase of goethite.
- Keywords
- химическое соосаждение магнетит маггемит
- Date of publication
- 12.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 8
References
- 1. Kaiyi Jiang, Linlin Zhang, Gang Bao // Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering. December 2021.
- 2. Yang Ruan, Lingjun Kong, Yiwen Zhong et al. // J. of Cleaner Production, Available online 7 September 2021.
- 3. Faruk Yakasai, Mohd Zaidi Jaafar, Sulalit Bandyopadhyay, Zhong et al. // J. of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Elsevier, Available online 2 September 2021
- 4. Saragi T., Santika A.S., Permana B. et al. // Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, (2017). 196, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/196/1/012025
- 5. Hasany S.F., Abdurahman N.H., Sunarti A.R., Jose R. // Current Nanoscience. 2013. V. 9. Iss. 5. P. 561. https://doi.org/10.2174/15734137113099990085
- 6. Ansari S.A.M.K., Ficiarà E., Ruffinatti F.A. et al. // Materials. 2019. V. 12. № 3. P. 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030465
- 7. Schwaminger S.P., Syhr C., Berensmeier S. // Crystals. 2020. V. 10. P. 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10030214
- 8. Rashid H., Mansoor M.A., Haider B. et al. // Separation Science and Technology. 2019. V. 55. No 6. P. 1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2019.1585876
- 9. Laurent S., Forge D., Port M. et al. // Chemical Reviews. 2008. V. 108. № 6. P. 2064.
- 10. Шилова О.А., Николаев А.М., Коваленко А.С. и др. // Журн. неорг. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 3. С. 398.
- 11. Hayato Koizumi Md. Azhar Uddin Yoshiei Kato // Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 2021. V. 124. 1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.10840000
- 12. Eskandari M.J., Hasanzadeh I. // Materials Science and Engineering: B. 2021. V. 266. P. 115050.
- 13. Chuev M.A. // JMMM. 2019. 470. P. 12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.11.091
- 14. Nasrazadani S., Raman A. // Corrosion Science. 1993. V. 34. № 8. P. 1355.
- 15. Anthony J.W., Bideaux R.A., Bladh K.W. Magnetite. Handbook of Mineralogy. Chantilly, VA: Mineralogical Society of America, 2018. 333 p.
- 16. Pecharroman C., Gonzalez-Carreno T., Iglesias J.E. // Phys. Chem. Miner. 1995. V. 22. P. 21.
- 17. Radek Zboril, Miroslav Mashlan, Dimitris Petridis // Chem. Mater. 2002. V. 14. № 3. P. 969.
- 18. Jeppe Fock, Lara K Bogart, David González-Alonso, et al. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2017. V. 50. P. 265005.
