RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2 when Using N-Substituted Salts of 2,4,6-Triphenylpyridine

PII
10.31857/S0044453723080058-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044453723080058
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 97 / Issue number 8
Pages
1097-1105
Abstract
A study is performed of the electrocatalytic activity of substituted pyridine salts (N-hydro-, N‑methyl-, and N-phenyl-2,4,6-triphenylpyridinium perchlorates) in the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide. The effect the natures of the substituent and the H+ source have on the efficiency of the process is determined. The main reasons for the occurrence of the electrocatalytic process are identified, and the values of TOF (catalyst speed) and TON (number of revolutions of the catalyst) are calculated. It is shown that the values of TOF and TON fall as the pK of the acid rises.
Keywords
электрокатализатор пиридин восстановление углекислый газ
Date of publication
12.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
6

References

  1. 1. Liu J.-L., Wang X., Li X.-S. et al. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020. V. 53. № 25. P. 253001.https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab7c04
  2. 2. Jenkinson D.S., Adams D.E., Wild A. // Nature. 1991. V. 351. № 6324. P. 304. https://doi.org/10.1038/351304a0.
  3. 3. Weimer T., Schaber K., Specht M. et al. // Energy Conversion and Management/ 1996. V. 370020 № 6–8. P. 1351.https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904 (95)00345-2
  4. 4. Ren S., Joulié D., Salvatore D. // Science. 2019. V. 365. № 6451. P. 367.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax4608
  5. 5. Jin S., Hao Z., Zhang K. // Angewandte Chemie. 2021. V. 133. № 38. P. 20795.https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202101818
  6. 6. Nielsen D.U., Hu X.-M. // Nat. Catal. 2018. V. 1. № 4. P. 244.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0051-3
  7. 7. Hori Y., Wakebe H., Tsukamoto T. et al. // Electrochimica Acta. 1994. № 39. № 11–12. P. 1833.https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686 (94)85172-7
  8. 8. Gao X., Liang J., Wu L. et al. // Catalysts. 2022. V. 12. № 1. P. 66.https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12010066
  9. 9. Frontera P., Macario A., Ferraro M. et al. // Catalysts. 2017. V. 7. № 12. P. 59.https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7020059
  10. 10. Mikhail M., Wang B., Jalain R. et al. // Reac. Kinet. Mech. Cat. 2019. V. 126. № 2. P. 629–643.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-018-1508-8
  11. 11. Zhu D.D., Liu J.L., Qiao S.Z. // Adv. Mater. 2016. V. 28. № 18. P. 3423.https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504766
  12. 12. Alberico E., Nielsen M. // Chem. Commun. 2015. V. 51. № 31. P. 6714.https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC09471A
  13. 13. Dong K., Razzaq R., Hu Y. // Top Curr. Chem. (Z). 2017. V. 375. № 2. P. 23.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-017-0107-x
  14. 14. Boutin E., Robert M. // Trends in Chemistry. 2021. V. 3. № 5. P. 359.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2021.02.003
  15. 15. Qiao J., Liu Y., Hong F. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014. V. 43. № 2. P. 631.https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60323G
  16. 16. Zheng Y., Vasileff A., Zhou X. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019. V. 141. № 19. P. 7646.https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02124
  17. 17. Lim R.J., Xie M., Sk M.A. et al. // Catalysis Today. 2014. V. 233. P. 169.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.037
  18. 18. Specht M. // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 1998. V. 23. № 5. P. 387.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199 (97)00077-3
  19. 19. Barton Cole E., Lakkaraju P.S., Rampulla D.M. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010. V. 132. № 33. P. 11539.https://doi.org/0.1021/ja1023496
  20. 20. Dolganov A.V., Tanaseichuk B.S., Pryanichnikova M.K., et al. // J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2019. V. 32. № 5. e3930.https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.3930
  21. 21. Dolganov A.V., Muryumin E.E., Chernyaeva O.Y. et al. // Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2019. V. 224. P. 148.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.006
  22. 22. Dolganov A.V., Tanaseichuk, B.S., Tsebulaeva Y.V. et al. // Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016. P. 9559.https://doi.org/10.20964/2016.11.24
  23. 23. Dolganov A.V., Tanaseichuk B.S., Yurova V.Yu. et al. // Intern. J. of Hydrogen Energy 2019. V. 44. № 39. P. 21495.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.067
  24. 24. Dolganov A.V., Tanaseichuk B.S., Moiseeva D.N. et al. // Electrochem. Commun., 2016. V. 68. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2016.04.015
  25. 25. Dolganov A.V., Chernyaeva O.Y., Kostryukov S.G. et al. // Intern. J. of Hydrogen Energy 2020. V. 45. № 1. P. 501.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.175
  26. 26. Ganz O.Yu., Klimaeva L.A., Chugunov D.B. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 2022. V. 96 № 5. P. 954.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024422050120
  27. 27. Klimaeva L.A., Ganz O.Yu., Chugunov D.B. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 2022. V. 96. № 5. P. 958.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024422050156
  28. 28. Urban J., Volke J. // Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1994. V. 59. № 11. P. 2545.https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc19942545
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library