Error _selectel_forbidden_access
Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

Rhodium electronic state in catalysts based on Rh/НZSM-5 for oxidative carbonylation of methane into acetic acid: effect of copper and zinc doping

You can
PII
S0044453725020172-1
DOI
10.31857/S0044453725020172
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
M. I. Shilina
  • Affiliation: Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis
Volume/ Edition
Volume 99 / Issue number 2
Pages
309-318
Abstract
Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy of adsorbed carbon monoxide is used along with X-ray absorption spectroscopy to study the effect a second alloying metal (Zn, Cu) has on the electronic state and local structure of rhodium on the surfaces of Rh/HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst. It is established that introducing copper and zinc helps improve the stability of rhodium toward aggregation (the formation of clusters) under conditions of the oxidative carbonylation of methane into acetic acid. Compared to monometallic catalyst Rh/HZSM-5, where single atom rodium sites are partially aggregated into clusters, the proportion of Rh° is halved in the case of Rh–Zn/HZSM-5, and Rh clustering does not occur in the case of Rh‒Cu/HZSM-5. The stabilizing effect of Cu is due to the interaction between copper and rhodium cations on the surface of zeolite.
Keywords
одноатомные родиевые катализаторы цеолит ZSM-5 легирование вторым металлом (Zn Сu) окислительное карбонилирование метана уксусная кислота
Date of publication
13.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
19

References

  1. 1. Kumar P., Al-Attas T.A., Hu J., Kibria M.G. // ACS Nano. 2022. V. 16. P. 8557. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c02464
  2. 2. Shi Y.J., Zhou Y.W., Lou Y. et al. // Adv. Sci. 2022. V. 9. P. 2201520. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202201520
  3. 3. Moteki T., Tominaga N., Ogura M. // Appl. Cat. B: Env. 2022. V. 300. P. 120742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120742
  4. 4. Oda A., Horie M., Murata N. et al. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022. V. 12. P. 5488. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cy01471h
  5. 5. Kou Z., Zang W., Wang P. et al. // Nanoscale Horiz. 2020. V. 5. P. 757. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NH00088D
  6. 6. Ji Sh., Chen Y., Wang X. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2020. V. 120. P. 11900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00818
  7. 7. Ye Ch., Zhang N., Wang D., Li Y. // Chem. Commun. 2020. V. 56. P. 7687. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC03221B
  8. 8. Xiong H., Datye A.K., Wang Y. // Adv. Mater. 2021. V. 33. P. 2004319. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004319
  9. 9. Alvarez-Galvan C., Melian M., Ruiz-Matas L. et al. // Front. Chem. 2019. V. 7. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00104
  10. 10. Hou Y., Nagamatsu Sh., Asakura K. et al. // Commun. Chem. 2018. V. 1. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-018-0044-9
  11. 11. Prieto G., Zečevic J., Friedrich H. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2013. V. 12. P. 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3471
  12. 12. Feng S., Song X., Ren Zh., Ding Y. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019. V. 58. P. 4755. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b05402
  13. 13. Batova T.I., Stashenko A.N., Obukhova T.K. et al. // Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2023. V. 366. P. 112953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112953
  14. 14. Pappas D.K., Borfecchia E., Dyballa M. et al. // Chem. Cat. Chem. 2019. V. 11. P. 621. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201801542
  15. 15. Zhang P., Yang X., Hou X. et al. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019. V. 9. P. 6297. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY01749F
  16. 16. Mahyuddin M.H., Tanaka S., Shiota Y., Yoshizawa K. // Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2020. V. 93. P. 345. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.20190282
  17. 17. Wang S., Guo Sh., Luo Y. et al. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019. V. 9. P. 6613. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY01803D
  18. 18. Matsubara H., Tsuji E., Moriwaki Y. et al. // Catal. Lett. 2019. V. 149. P. 2627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02855-y
  19. 19. Chernyshov A.A., Veligzhanin A.A., Zubavichus Y.V. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2009. T. 603. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.12.167
  20. 20. Newville M. // J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2001. V. 8. P. 96. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049500016290
  21. 21. Kolesnichenko N.V., Batova T.I., Stashenko A.N. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022. V. 344. P. 112239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112239
  22. 22. Ivanova E., Mihaylov M., Thibault-Starzyk F. et al. // Catal. 2005. V. 236. P. 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.09.017
  23. 23. Hadjiivanov K., Ivanova E., Dimitrov L., Knözinger H. // J. Molec. Struct. 2003. V. 661–662. P. 459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2003.09.007
  24. 24. Osuga R., Saikhantsetseg B., Yasuda S. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2020. V. 56. P. 5913. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC02284E
  25. 25. Davydov A. Edited by Sheppard N. Molecular Spectroscopy of Oxide Catalyst Surfaces. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 2003. P. 668. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1351-4180 (03)01049-3
  26. 26. Hadjiivanov K.I., Vayssilov G.N. // Adv. Catal. 2002. V. 47. P. 307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861 (95)00163-8
  27. 27. Asokan C., Thang H., Pacchioni G., Christopher P. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 10. P. 1597. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY00146E
  28. 28. Matsubu J.C., Yang V.N., Christopher P. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015. V. 137. P. 3076. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja5128133
  29. 29. Шилина М.И., Обухова Т.К., Батова Т.И., Колесниченко Н.В. // Журн. физ. химии. 2023. Т. 97. № 7. С. 944. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723070269 [Shilina M.I., Obukhova T.K., Batova T.I., Kolesnichenko N.V. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2023. V. 97. № 7. P. 1387. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423070269]
  30. 30. Субботин А.Н., Жидомиров Г.М., Субботина И.Р., Казанский В.Б. // Кинетика и катализ. 2013. Т. 54. № 6. С. 786. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0453881113060130 [Subbotin A.N., Zhidomirov G.M., Subbotina I.R., Kazansky V.B. // Kinet. Catal. 2013. V. 54. № 6. Р. 744. https://doi.org/10.1134/s002315841306013x]
  31. 31. Palomino G.T., Fisicaro P., Bordiga S. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000. V. 104. P. 4064. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993893u
  32. 32. Ikuno T., Grundner S., Jentys A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019. V. 123. P. 8759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10293
  33. 33. Sushkevich V.L., van Bokhoven J.A. // Chem. Commun. 2018. V. 54. P. 7447. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cc03921f
  34. 34. Lamberti C., Groppo E., Spoto G. et al. // Adv. Catal. 2007. V. 51. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-0564 (06)51001-6
  35. 35. Ivanin I.A., Udalova O.V., Kaplin I.Yu., Shilina M.I. // Applied Surface Science. 2024. V. 655. P. 159577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.159577
  36. 36. Skinner W.M., Prestidge C.A., Smart R.St.C. // Surf. Interf. Anal. 1996. V. 24. P. 620. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1096-9918(19960916)24:93.0.CO;2-Y
  37. 37. Carrasco E., Oujja M., Sanz M. et al. // Microchem J. 2018. V. 137. P. 381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2017.11.014
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library