- PII
- S3034553725090105-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034553725090105
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 99 / Issue number 9
- Pages
- 1368-1375
- Abstract
- This work presents the results of investigation of the influence of synthesis parameters of Ge-Co-In nanostructures on their electrochemical properties. It was found that the optimal ratio of aqueous complex solutions of Ge (IV) and Co (II) is GeCo (3:2), at which the obtained sample has the highest Coulombic efficiency at the first cycle equal to 80% and reversible capacity with respect to lithium introduction about 1190 mAh/g. In turn, increasing the solution temperature to 40°C allows to obtain a sample which has a Coulombic efficiency at the first cycle of about 92% without the use of special organic additives in the electrolyte.
- Keywords
- германий кобальт наноструктуры электрохимическое осаждение литий-ионный аккумулятор
- Date of publication
- 13.03.2026
- Year of publication
- 2026
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 26
References
- 1. Luo H., Wang Y., Feng Y.-H., et al. // Materials. 2022. V. 15. № 22. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15228166
- 2. Dong X., Wang Y., Xia Y. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2021. V. 54. № 20. P. 3883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00420
- 3. Feng Y., Zhou L., Ma H., et al. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2022. V. 15. № 5. P. 1711. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE03292E
- 4. Belgibayeva A., Rakhmetova A., Rakhatkyyy M., et al. // J. Power Sources. 2023. V. 557. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232550
- 5. Li C., Huang Q., Mao J. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2020. V. 31. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-04658-z
- 6. Pu Z., Li H., Yang Z., et al. // Mater. Today Chem. 2022. V. 26. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101145
- 7. Hu B., Zhou X., Xu J., et al. // Chem Electro Chem. 2020. V. 7. P. 716. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201901914
- 8. Wang G., Chen J., Zhang F., et al. // Energy Storage. 2023. V. 74. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cst.2023.109415
- 9. Collins G., McNamara K., Kilian S., et al. // ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 1793. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c02928
- 10. Choi S., Cho Y., Kim J., et al.// Small. 2017. V. 13. № 13. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201603045
- 11. Fugattini S., Guizar U., Andreoli A., et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2022. V. 411. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2022.139832
- 12. Gavrilin I.M., Kudryashova Yu.O., Kuz’mina A.A., et al. // J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021. Vol. 888. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115209
- 13. Kulova T.L., Gavrilin I.M., Kudryashova Y.O., et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2020. Vol. 30. P. 775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2020.11.029
- 14. Gavrilov S.A., Gavrilin I.M., Martynova I.K., et al. // Batteries. 2023. V. 9. № 9. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9090445
- 15. Gavrilin I.M., Emets V.V., Marinkin I.S., et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2025. V. 512. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145441
