RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

CHEMOINFORMATICS ANALYSIS OF THE KINETICS OF PHOTODESTRUCTION OF ACID AZO DYES IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION

PII
S3034553725110139-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034553725110139
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 99 / Issue number 11
Pages
1701-1709
Abstract
The study presents an analysis of the patterns of photodestruction of acid azo dyes in aqueous solution. A fragment-based approach was employed, which decomposes the molecule of the organic compound into molecular fragments of connected atoms. This analysis allowed evaluation of the contribution of molecular substructure fragments to the logarithm of the first-order photodestruction rate constant of the dyes. The effects and directions of fragments with various sequences of connected atoms were analyzed. The photodestruction kinetics in solution were compared with the lightfastness characteristics of the dyes adsorbed on a natural keratin substrate. Similarities were found between several individual polyatomic fragments responsible for photodestruction in solution and those affecting lightfastness in the natural substrate.
Keywords
азокрасители хемоинформационный анализ метод фрагментов
Date of publication
20.05.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
25

References

  1. 1. SDC, AATCC. Colour Index™ Online. https://colour-index.com/about
  2. 2. World Dye Variety. http://www.worlddyevariety.com/
  3. 3. Kuenemann M.A., Szymczyk M., ChenY. et al. // Chemical Science. 2017. V. 8. № 7. P. 4334. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC00567A.
  4. 4. Williams T.N., Kuenemann M.A., Van Den Driessche G.A. et al. // ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2018. V. 6. № 2. P. 2344. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03795.
  5. 5. Williams T.N., Van Den Driessche G.A., Valery A.R.B. et al. // Ibid. 2018. V. 6. № 11. P. 14248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02882.
  6. 6. Кузнецов Д.Н., Кобраков К.И., Ручкина А.Г. et al. // Изв. вузов. Химия и химическая технология. 2017. T. 60. № 1. C. 4. https://doi.org/10.6060/tcct.2017601.5423.
  7. 7. Кричевский Г.Е. Фотохимические превращения красителей и светостабилизация окрашенных материалов. М.: Химия, 1986. 248 с.
  8. 8. Hagan, E., Castro-Soto, I., Breault, M. et al. // Heritage Science. 2022. V. 10. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00675-9.
  9. 9. Mishra V.R., Ghanavatkar C.W., Kumari Shukla V. et al. Computational Chemistry Methods: 7 Effect of substituent on photostability and lightfastness of azo dye and their photodegradation mechanism — Mechanistic study using density functional theory, Applications. P. Ramasami, Ed.; De Gruyter, Berlin; Boston, 2020. P. 115. ISBN 9783110631623.
  10. 10. Telegin F.Y., Ran J., Pryazhnikova V.G. // The Scientific Notes of Color Society of Russia. V. 1. First Russian Congress on Color; Schindler, Verena M., Griber, Yulia A., Eds.; Smolensk State University. 2019. P. 97.
  11. 11. Ran J., Pryazhnikova V.G., Telegin F.Y. // Colorants 2022. V. 1. № 3. P. 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/colorants1030017
  12. 12. Telegin F.Y., Malanker J.V., Ran J. et al. 9 — Innovations in dyes and chemoinformatics approach // Sustainable Innovations in the Textile Industry: The Textile Institute Book Series, R. Paul, T. Gries, Eds. Woodhead Publishing, 2024. P. 217—254. ISBN978-0-323-90392-9.
  13. 13. Javaid R., Qazi U.Y. // Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019. V. 16. № 11. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16112066.
  14. 14. Khataee, A. R., Kasiri, M.B. // J. of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2010. V. 328. № 1—2. P. 8—26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2010.05.023.
  15. 15. Deng, Y., Li, S., Ye, D. et al. // Micromachines. 2020. V. 11. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11010081.
  16. 16. Weiss A.M., Yariv E., Reisfeld R. // Optical Materials. 2003. V. 24. № 1—2. P. 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-3467 (03)00101-0.
  17. 17. Yan K., Hu Z., Yu P. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. P. 2593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46853-0.
  18. 18. Sokolowska, J., Czajkowski, W., Podsiadły, R. // Dyes and Pigments. 2001. V. 49. № 3. P. 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7208 (01)00018-3.
  19. 19. Liu, Y., Liu, S., Miao, R. et al. // Tetrahedron. 2023. V. 149. P. 133664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2023.133664.
  20. 20. Lin, S.-L., Su, S.-P., Yang, Y.-Z. et al. // J. of Nanobiotechnology. 2025. V. 23. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-025-03145-z.
  21. 21. Zhai Y., Chang Y., Tang A. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025. V. 13. P. 9589. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA09019E.
  22. 22. Zhang G., Zhang S. // J. Environ. Sci. (China). 2020. V. 90. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.11.009.
  23. 23. Маджидов, Т.И., Баскин, И.И., Антипин, И.С. и др. Введение в хемоинформатику: Компьютерное представление химических структур: учеб. пособие: 1: Компьютерное представление химических структур. Казань, Москва, Страсбург, 2020. 176 с.
  24. 24. David L., Thakkar A., Mercado R. et al. // J. Cheminform. 2020. V. 12. № 56. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00460-5.
  25. 25. ChemMine Tools. https://chemminetools.ucr.edu
  26. 26. Tibshirani R. // J. Series B: Methodological. 1996. V. 58. P. 267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.
  27. 27. Telegin F.Y. Fragment analysis of dye structure. https://github.com/ferntea/Fragment_analysis_of_dye_structure.
  28. 28. Baskin I., Varnek A. Fragment Descriptors in SAR/QSAR/QSPR Studies, Molecular Similarity Analysis and in Virtual Screening. In Chemoinformatics approaches to virtual screening; Varnek A., Tropsha A., Eds.; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, 2008. P. 1-43. ISBN97808540414420854041443.
  29. 29. Telegin F.Y., Marfin Y.S. // Rus. J. of Inorganic Chemistry. 2022. V. 67. P. 362. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622030135.
  30. 30. Zhokhova N.I., Palyulin V.A., Baskin I.I. et al. // Rus. J. of Phys. Chem. A. 2007. V. 81. P. 9. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024407010037.
  31. 31. Dolomatov M.Yu., Aubekerov T.M. // Rus. J. of Phys. Chem. A. 2018. V. 92. P. 401. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418030068.
  32. 32. Доломатов М.Ю., Коледин О.С., Ахтимова К.Р. // Изв. вузов. Химия и хим. технология. 2021. V. 64. C. 96. https://doi.org/10.6060/ivkkt.20216407.6394.
  33. 33. Matyushin D.D., Sholokhova A.Y., Buryak A.K. // Rus. J. of Phys. Chem. A. 2023. V. 97. P. 377. https://doi.org/10.1134/S00360244423020152.
  34. 34. Emperor Chemical. https://emperordye.com.
  35. 35. María Curieses Andrés C., La Manuel Pérez de Lastra, J. et al. Reactivity and Applications of Singlet Oxygen Molecule. In Reactive Oxygen Species - Advances and Developments; Surguchov, A., Ahmad, R., Eds.; IntechOpen, London, 2024. P. 1-24. ISBN978-1-83768-209-6.
  36. 36. Wang T., Chen W., Dong T. et al. // Materials (Basel) 2020. 13. № 18. P. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184141.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library