RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceЖурнал физической химии Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0044-4537
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5537

ADSORPTION AND REACTION OF MOLECULES OF NITROGEN OXIDE (NO) ON THE SURFACE OF NICKEL NANO-SIZED CLUSTERS ON ALUMINIUM OXIDE α-Al2O3(0001)

PII
S30345537S0044453725040102-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034553725040102
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 99 / Issue number 4
Pages
611-619
Abstract
Adsorption and reaction of nitrogen oxide (NO) molecules on the surface of a model metal-oxide system formed by controlled deposition of nickel clusters under ultrahigh vacuum conditions on the surface of α-Al2O3(0001) aluminum oxide thin film grown on the Mo(110) substrate is studied insitu by experimental surface analysis methods. According to X-ray photoelectron and electron Auger spectroscopy, infrared Fourier spectroscopy, and temperature-programmed desorption data, there is a conditional Ni cluster size of 2 nm that separates the nature of the electronic state of NO molecules adsorbed on their surface and their reactivity. It is found that the peculiarity of Ni clusters with a characteristic size not exceeding 2 nm is that NO molecules are adsorbed on their surface in the form of dimers (NO)2 while for clusters of larger size adsorption occurs in the form of monomers (NO). It is concluded that this difference is the reason for the different reaction behavior of the molecules. The key difference between clusters smaller and larger than 2 nm in size is that in the former case N2O molecules are formed upon heating the system and desorbed into the gas phase while this does not occur in the latter case. The formation of N2O is due to the mutual influence of NO molecules forming the (NO)2 dimer under the action of the metal/oxide interface. The results indicate that it is possible to tune the catalytic efficiency of the metal-oxide system by varying the size of the applied metal cluster.
Keywords
тонкие пленки металлооксидные системы кластеры металлов адсорбция оксид азота никель оксид алюминия методы анализа поверхности теория функционала плотности
Date of publication
15.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
26

References

  1. 1. Shiotari A., Koshida H., Okuyama H. // Surf. Sci. Rep. 2021. V. 76. P. 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2020.100500
  2. 2. Kim D.H., Ringe S., Kim H. et al. // Nature Commun. 2021. V. 12. P. 1856. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22147-7
  3. 3. Rosca V., Duca M., de Groot M.T., Koper M.T.M. // Chem. Rev. 2009. V. 109, P. 2209. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr8003696
  4. 4. Hu Y., Griffiths K., Norton P.R. // Surf. Sci. 2009. V. 603. P. 1740. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2008.09.051
  5. 5. Smirnov M.Y., Gorodetskii V.V., Block, J.H. // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1996, V. 107. P. 359. https://doi.org/10.1016/1381-1169 (95)00175-1
  6. 6. de Vooys A.C.A., Koper M.T.M., van Santen R.A., van Veen J.A.R. // J. Catal. V. 2001. V. 202. P. 387. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2001.3275
  7. 7. Hess C., Ozensoy E., Yi C.-W., Goodman D.W. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. V. 2006. V. 128. P. 2988. doi: 10.1021/ja057131q
  8. 8. Paul D.K., Smith B.W., Marten C.D., Burchett J. // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chemical. 2001. V. 167. P. 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1169 (00)00492-1
  9. 9. Fuente S.A., Fortunato L.F., Domancich N. et al. // Surf. Sci. 2012. V. 606. P. 1948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2012.08.003
  10. 10. Brown W.A., King D.A. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000. V. 104. P. 2578. doi: 10.1021/jp9930907.
  11. 11. Conrad H., Ertl G., Kuppers J., Latta E.E. // Surf. Sci. 1975. V. 50. P. 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028 (75)90026-6
  12. 12. Henry C.H. // Surf. Sci. Rep. 1998. V. 31. P. 235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729 (98)00002-8
  13. 13. Hirschmugl C.J. // Surf. Sci. 2002. V. 500. P. 577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028 (01)01523-0
  14. 14. Chen P.J., Goodmann D.W. // Surf. Sci. 1994. V. 312. P. L767. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028 (94)90719-6
  15. 15. Magkoev T.T., Christmann K., Moutinho A.M.C., Murata Y. // Surf. Sci. 2002. V. 515. P. 538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028 (02)01972-6
  16. 16. Venables J.A. Introduction to Surface and thin Films Processes. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 2010. 372 p. ISBN: 9780511755651. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755651
  17. 17. Baumer M., Freund H.-J. // Progr. Surf. Sci. 1999. V. 61. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6816 (99)00012-X
  18. 18. Grigorkina G.S., Zaalishvili V.B., Burdzieva O.G. et al. // Solid State Commun. 2018. V. 276. P. 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2018.04.001
  19. 19. Magkoev T.T. // Vacuum. 2021. V. 189. P. 110220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110220
  20. 20. Chen J.G., Erley W., Ibach H. // Surf. Sci. 1989. V. 224. P. 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028 (89)90911-4
  21. 21. Demir S., Fellah M.F. // Surf. Sci. 2020. V. 701. P. 121689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2020.121689
  22. 22. Beniya A., Isomura N., Hirata H., Watanabe Y. // Surf. Sci. 2013. V. 613. P. 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2013.03.001
  23. 23. Blyholder G. // J. Phys. Chem. 1964. V. 68. P. 2772. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100792a006
  24. 24. Aizawa H., Tsuneyuki S. // Surf. Sci. 1998. V. 399. P. L364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028 (98)00042-9
  25. 25. Wimmer E., Fu C.L., Freeman A.J. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985. V. 55. P. 2618. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2618
  26. 26. Jennison D.R., Verdozzi C., Schultz P.A., Sears M.P. // Phys. Rev. B. 1999. V. 59. P. R15605. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R15605
  27. 27. Mattsson A.E., Jennison D.R. // Surf. Sci. 2002. V. 520. P. L611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028 (02)02209-4
  28. 28. Tonner B.P., Kao C.M., Plummer E.W. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983. V. 51. P. 1378. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1378
  29. 29. Ibach H., Lehwald S. // Surf. Sci. 1978. V. 76. P. l. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028 (78)90065-1
  30. 30. Bertolo M., Jacobi K. // Surf. Sci. 1990. V. 226. P. 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028 (90)90486-R
  31. 31. Hess C., Ozensoy E., Yi C.-W., Goodman D.W. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006. V. 128. P. 2988. doi: 10.1021/ja057131q
  32. 32. Duarte H.A., Salahub D.R. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997. V. 101. P. 7464. doi: 10.1021/Jp9706801
  33. 33. Pacchioni G., Rosch N. // Surf. Sci. 1994. V. 306. P. 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028 (94)91195-9
  34. 34. Debeila M.A., Coville N.J., Scurrell M.S., Hearne G.R. // Catal. Today. 2002. V. 72. P. 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861 (01)00480-1
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library