- PII
- S0044453725020205-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0044453725020205
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 99 / Issue number 2
- Pages
- 331-338
- Abstract
- The electrochemical reaction reduction of nitrites (NO2−RR) in a neutral aqueous electrolyte is studied, which has important applications both for future ammonia synthesis processes and for effective wastewater and agricultural wastewater treatment. The catalytic activity is compared (the results of the Faradaic efficiency and the yield rate of ammonia are obtained) for noble (platinum) and non-noble (cobalt) metals. Metallic polycrystalline platinum and cobalt serve as electrocatalyst. The surface of the catalysts is analyzed using SEM and light microscopy. The method of linear voltammetry is used to preliminarily identify the potential of ammonia synthesis and estimate the synthesis current density. The values of Faradaic efficiency (FE) and the yield rate of ammonia release are obtained for the five selected values of current densities (J). It is found that the cobalt cathode is more efficient (FE ≈ 99%, yield rate (NH3) = 2.4 mmol h–1 cm–2), which exceeds the values for the platinum cathode ((FE = 88.1%, yield rate (NH3) = 0.4 mmol h–1 cm–2). The electrochemically active surface (ECSA) of the electrocatalysts is determined. The explanation of such activity of catalysts is given according to the results of the work that demonstrate that a non-noble metal cathode can be more effective for NO2−RR.
- Keywords
- электрокатализ восстановление нитритов платиновый катализатор кобальтовый катализатор экологическая химия
- Date of publication
- 12.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 12
References
- 1. Makepeace J.W., He T., Weidenthaler C. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. P. 7746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.144
- 2. John J., MacFarlane D.R., Simonov A.N. // Nat. Catal. 2023. V. 6. P. 1125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-023-01060-w
- 3. Lebedeva O., Kultin D., Каlenchuk A., Кustov L. // Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2023. V. 38. P. 101207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2022.101207
- 4. Imamura K., Kubota J. // Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2019. V. 3. Р. 1406. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00049F.
- 5. Shao J., Jing H., Wei P. et al. // Nat. Energy. 2023. V. 8. Р. 1273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01386-6
- 6. Murphy E., Liu Y., Matanovic I. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2023. V. 14. Р. 4554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40174-4
- 7. Bai L., Franco F., Timoshenko J. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024. V. 146. Р. 9665. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c13288
- 8. Jiang Z., Wang Y., Lin Z. et al. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2023. V. 16. Р. 2239. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03502B
- 9. Kuznetsova I., Lebedeva O., Kultin D. et al. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024. V. 25. Р. 7089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137089
- 10. Jiang Z., Wang Y., Lin Z. et al. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2023. V. 16. Р. 2239. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03502B
- 11. Petrii O.A., Safonova T.Ya. // J. Electroanal. Chem. 1992. V. 331. Р. 897. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728 (92)85013-S
- 12. Xiang J., Qiang C., Shang S. et al. // Adv. Funct. Materials. 2024. Р. 2401941. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202401941
- 13. Zhao H., Xiang J., Sun Z. et al. // ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2024. V. 12. Р. 2783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c07388
- 14. Wang F., Xiang J., Zhang G. et al. // Nano Res. 2024. V. 17. Р. 3660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-023-6261-2
- 15. Wang F., Zhao H., Zhang G. et al. // Adv. Funct. Materials. 2024. V. 34. Р. 2308072. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202308072
- 16. Wang F., Shang S., Sun Z. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2024. V. 489. Р. 151410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.151410
- 17. Xiang J., Zhao H., Chen K. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024. V. 653. Р. 390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.09.095
- 18. Xiang J., Zhao H., Chen K. et al. // Ibid. 2024. V. 659. Р. 432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.01.013
- 19. Wan Y., Du W., Chen K. et al. // Ibid. 2023. V. 652. Р. 2180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.09.071
- 20. Wu T., Zhang F., Wang J. et al. // Dalton Trans. 2024. V. 53. Р. 877. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DT03808D
- 21. Li Y., Ouyang L., Chen J. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024. V. 663. Р. 405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.02.153
- 22. Qu Y., Guo Y., Chu K. // Inorg. Chem. 2024. V. 63. Р. 78. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c04194
- 23. Zhang Y., Wan Y., Liu X. et al. // iScience. 2023. V. 26. Р. 107944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107944
- 24. Dima G.E., De Vooys A.C.A., Koper M.T.M. // J. Electroanal. Chem. 2003. V. 554–555. Р. 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728 (02)01443-2
- 25. De Groot M.T., Koper M.T.M. // J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004. V. 562. Р. 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.08.011
- 26. Lebedeva O., Zakharov V., Kuznetsova I. et al. // Chem. – Eur. J. 2024. V. 30. Р. e202402075. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202402075
- 27. Adalder A., Mitra K., Barman N. et al. // ChemRxiv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-v8chs
